PitchScorecard Method™ · Signal Compression v1 · Algorithm v4
AI startups = 45% of 2024 unicorns. Vibe-coding (Replit, Bolt, Lovable) compresses dev timelines but lowers replication barriers. AI-native moat = table stakes.
Supply chain fragmentation. Talent visa restrictions. US-China tech decoupling. Nearshoring trend accelerating. Monitor regulatory exposure.
TikTok, Reels, YouTube Shorts dominate GTM. Virality is now a product feature. B2C without social hook = significant headwind.
Rates tightening. Burn multiple scrutiny at peak. Capital efficiency demands: burn <1.5×, LTV:CAC ≥3×. Rule of 40 back in fashion.
PitchScorecard Method™ · Signal Compression v1 · KillSwitch Engine v1
Market + Team + Traction = 75% of decision · Hover cards for tips · ● line = ecosystem avg (65)
Used by KillSwitch Engine v1 for contradiction detection. Leave 0 if unknown.
Informs Investment Memo narrative only — does NOT alter core score (Algorithm v3 fix).
Scored 0–100. Used in Bill Payne calculation and Investment Memo. Do NOT affect core score.
Set regional median for accurate pre-money estimation.
Include: team backgrounds, market size with sources, traction metrics, product description, and business model for best results.
Run an analysis to see results here, or load demo data to explore Lucidata and Kidzu.
Side-by-side · Up to 6 deals · All engines applied
From pitch to decision — using investor-grade signal detection.
Ruthless prioritization: Market + Team + Traction = 75% of decision. All other factors move to Modifier/Insights layer.
| Signal | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| 🌍 Market | 30% | TAM/SAM/SOM, growth rate, urgency, sector timing |
| 👥 Team | 25% | Domain expertise, execution history, completeness, commitment |
| 📈 Traction | 20% | Revenue, users, CAC/LTV, retention, contracts |
| ⚡ Product | 15% | UVP clarity, defensibility, IP, network effects |
| 💰 Biz Model | 10% | Monetization, unit economics, scalability, burn |
Hard rules that override scores. Real investors don't just average — they eliminate deals.
Prevents AI score inflation. Forces conservative, realistic scoring.
Gold standard for pre-revenue startup valuation. Displayed prominently in results.
| Score | Interpretation | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 80–100 | Exceptional — top-quartile | Team: Ex-Google founder, 2 exits, full team |
| 65–79 | Above average — strong evidence | Market: $500M TAM with 3rd-party validation |
| 50–64 | Average — mixed signals | Traction: Some users but no revenue |
| 35–49 | Below average — weak evidence | Biz model: Unclear monetization |
| 0–34 | Red flag — significant risk | Team: Solo founder, no domain expertise |
PitchScorecard.com is an analytical tool designed to assist investment decision-making. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. All scores and valuations are estimates based on input data. Always conduct thorough due diligence before making investment decisions.
Evaluate. Compare. Invest.
PitchScorecard was developed by Dr. Beza B. Lefebo, a distinguished expert in the fields of cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. Dr. Lefebo holds a Doctor of Engineering in Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, with a focus on Analytics and Machine Learning AI, from George Washington University.
His doctoral research involved the development of a novel algorithm designed to predict and detect Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) cyberattacks targeting critical U.S. smart grid power infrastructure. Beyond his technical research, Dr. Lefebo is a published author, dedicated educator, and a sought-after advisor to industry leaders.
Notice
PitchScorecard provides analytical insights and is not intended to serve as financial advice. Users should conduct their own due diligence.
Copyright
The PitchScorecard logo and the unique algorithmic architecture powering this application are protected by copyright law. All rights reserved.